Research

Deirdre Boyd

May 13, 2008

CANNABIS: HEART ATTACK RISKS

Smoking cannabis can raise the risk of heart attacks, reveals authoritative research from the National Institute on Drug Abuse in Baltimore, reported in Molecular Psychiatry.

The researchers focused on apolipoprotein, a blood protein which regulates the breakdown of fats linked to heart disease. Levels were significantly higher in cannabis smokers, raising the amount of dangerous fats in the blood.

The finding adds to mounting evidence that the drug can affect physical as well as mental health.

Deirdre Boyd

May 08, 2008

What are today's social evils?

ANSWER: "ALCOHOL AND DRUGS" AND "DECLINE OF FAMILY"

Over a century has passed since the Joseph Rowntree Foundation identified poverty, war, slavery, intemperance, the opium trade, impurity and gambling as the "great scourges of humanity". Now it reveals the findings of a public consultation exploring the "social evils" facing the UK today.

The new list is the result of a web survey of 3,500 people and discussions with "groups whose voices are not usually heard". Overall concerns were identified as: decline of community, individualism versus feeling part of a wider society, consumerism/greed and decline of values. Below are key findings.

"CONCRETE, SOCIAL EVILS":

Decline of the family - family breakdown and poor parenting were felt to cause many other social problems and leave young people particularly vulnerable.

Drugs and alcohol - misuse of these was viewed as both the consequence and cause of many other social problems, like family breakdown and poverty.  Addiction Today endorses this.

Young people as victims or perpetrators.

Crime and violence - people felt that the UK is more dangerous and violent than in the past; child abuse and exploitation were highlighted.

Poverty and inequality.

Immigration and responses to immigration - participants felt that local residents lose out to immigrants in competition for scarce resources; others criticised negative attitudes to immigrants.

MISUSE OF DRUGS AND ALCOHOL

Participants saw the misuse of drugs and alcohol as very damaging to society, mainly because of the links between substance misuse and violence, crime and antisocial behaviour. Drug and alcohol misuse was suggested as a cause of ill-health, poverty and family breakdown.

Conversely, drug and alcohol misuse was also described as a consequence of family breakdown, weak communities, child abuse, domestic violence, poverty, stress, unemployment and lack of opportunties for education.

Participants recognised that it could provide "a means of escape from social, economic and other personal problems". There was also concern that celebrities, films and TV can glamorise drug and alcohol use, especially among  young people.

Many of these concerns were echoed in the personal experiences of the unheard voices: some older participants highlighted the damaging nature of drug-taking and the devastating effects drugs could have. Ex-offenders who took part in the research spoke about the links between drugs and crime in their lives.

WHO OR WHAT INFLUENCES THIS?

Most commonly cited as responsible for social evils were government and the media. The government was seen to be out of touch with the real issues people face, and ineffective at tackling social problems. The media was criticised for fuelling negative and damaging attitudes and behaviours. Big business and religion were also cited.

People also emphasised the importance of individual choice in causing and perpetuating social evil and stressed peoploe's personal responsibility for overcoming social problems. Others blamed the structure of society, which can limit opportunities and underlie problematic behaviour.

Some participants suggested that social evils are entrenched in current ways of thinking and living, and that we are locked into a culture where consumerism and greed are prioritised over people and the community.

REPORT AUTHORS

The consultation was by Beth Watts and Charlie Lloyd (Joseph Rowntree Foundation) and Alice Mowlam and Chris Creegan (National Centre for Social Research).

To download either the full or abridged reports, click here.

Deirdre Boyd

May 05, 2008

CANNABIS: THE FACTS

Eddie Nestor invited Addiction Recovery Foundation CEO Deirdre Boyd onto his BBC Radio London show – at midnight! – Sunday [4 May] to debate the reclassification of cannabis with legalisation campaigner Steve Rolles. For listeners, these are the statistics and references used in the show – with acknowledgment to the help of ARF trustee Dr Andrea Grubb-Barthwell, formerly the [White House] deputy drug czar.

BACKGROUND:

Cannabis is the most commonly abuse illicit drug in the US and Europe. Its main active chemical is THC (delta-tetrahydrocannabinol). The membranes of certain nerve cells in the brain contain protein receptors which bind to THC. Once in place, THC kicks off a series of cellular reactions which ultimately lead to the high that users experience when they first smoke marijuana.

HARMS: LEGAL v ILLEGAL DRUGS

"Annual drug-related deaths are about 1,600 people a year -- compared to 22,000 from alcohol, 90,000-100,000 deaths from tobacco use – even benzodiazepine-related deaths each year exceed that of all illegal drugs except heroin. The harms by making drugs legal are multiples of illegal drugs, indicating that lessening their availability is a better option than legalisation."   The sources for this data are below.

“Drug -related deaths for the year are 1,608”
“Measuring the harm from illegal drugs: the drug harm index 2005”, Home Office update 2007

“Alcohol-related harm costs around £20billion a year”
Tony Blair, Prime Minister’s Foreword, Alcohol Harm Reduction Strategy for England

“The annual cost of alcohol misuse includes... up to 22,000 premature deaths per annum”
Alcohol Harm Reduction Strategy for England

“In Britain, 6 million deaths were caused by tobacco over the past 50 years” Average – 120,000 pa.
British Medical Journal 2004.

“Involuntary addiction to prescribed tranquillisers is the most serious drug problem in the UK today. Benzodiazepine-related deaths each year exceed that of all illegal drugs except heroin. The number of addicts (1.5) million exceeds by far the number addicted to all illegal drugs. And tranquillisers are more addictive than heroin”
All Party Parliamentary Group for Involuntary Tranquilliser Addiction, Newsletter 1, 22 January 2008

Hospital emergency visits:  alcohol-related 48.7%   cocaine 20%   marijuana 12.6%
Reference: Drug Abuse Warning Network, www.samhsa.gov

FACT: “MEDICAL MARIJUANA” SENDS THE WRONG MESSAGE TO KIDS

Benchmark surveys of drug use show that when young people believe a drug is harmful, the fewer young people use that drug.

US states which passed “medical” marijuana laws have among the highest past-month drug use (8 out of the 10 top slots) and addiction (7 out of the 10 top slots). Follow-up studies show this is a consistent cluster in those states.

The most recent study released in 2008 shows that these states are in the majority of the top 10 for first-time use of marijuana in the past year – for people aged as young as 12 to 25.
References: Monitoring the Future Survey, which has tracked drug use annually among US high-school students since1974. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, which has tracked drug use among Americans aged 12 and older since 1972.

FACT: MARIJUANA IS THE No 1 DRUG CHILDREN ARE IN TREATMENT FOR

In 2004, 14.6million Americans used marijuana at least once in the month before being surveyed; about 6,000 people a day started to use it for the first time: 2.1million people – of which 63.8% were younger than 18.
Reference: NIDA IndoFacts: Marijuana, National Institute of Drug Abuse.  2004 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings (Office of Applied Statistics), SMA 05-4061.

One study showed that, of about 182,000 children in treatment, 48% were admitted for abuse or addiction to marijuana – compared to ‘only’ 19.3% for alcohol, 2.9% for cocaine, 2.4% for methamphetamine and 2.3% for heroin.
References: Monitoring the Future, National Institute of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse – www.monitoringthefuture.org Overview of Findings from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health.

FACT: HOSPITAL EMERGENCY ROOMS

Every year, marijuana accounts for over 99,000 young people admitted to US hospital emergency rooms with marijuana-related complaints. Adults multiply the numbers. The figures are:

6-11 year olds                      380
12-17 year olds                    39,035
18-20 year olds                    27,742
21-24 year olds                    32,154   
T o t a l = 99,311
Reference: Drug Abuse Warning Network.

FACT: OTHER DAMAGE FROM “MEDICAL” MARIJUANA LAWS

“Medical” marijuana laws open the door for kids to use drugs. In California, high-school students openly smoked pot in class under protection of such laws – they managed to get it prescribed for conditions such as “sleeplessness” and “stress”.

The mixed message of “medical” marijuana will most likely have a terrible effect on parents’ ability to provide unequivocal information about drugs to their young children.
References: Office of National Drug Control Policy: What every American should know about medical marijuana. www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov.  DEA Congressional Testimony, statement by Thomas Constantine, administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration, US Dept of Justice; 2 December 1996.

FACTS: OTHER DAMAGE TO CHILDREN

“Cannabis use and educational attainment”
VOX, 18 September 2007

“Differential effects of delta-9-THC on learning in adolescent and adult rats”
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 2 May 2005

“Occurrence of cannabis use disorders and other cannabis-related problems among first-year college students”
Addictive Behaviors 33(3): 397-411, March 2008

FACTS: THERE ARE BOTH SHORT- AND LONG-TERM EFFECTS, including WITHDRAWAL

“”Drug craving and withdrawal symtoms can make it hard for long-erm marijuana smokers to stop abusing the drug. People report irritability, sleeplessness and anxiety...”
NIDA InfoFacts: Marijuana. Psychopharmacology 1999, 143(3):302-308 “Changes in aggressive behaviour during withdrawal from long-term marijuana use”

“... They also display increased aggression on psychological tests, peaking about one week after the last use of the drug”
NIDA InfoFacts: Marijuana.  Psychopharmacology 1999, 141(4):395-404 “Abstinence symptoms following smoked marijuana in humans”

“The short-term effects of marijuana can include problems with memory and learning; distorted perception; difficulty in thinking and problem solving; loss of coordination; and increased heart rate. Research findings for long-term marijuana abuse indicate changes in the brain similar to those seen after long-term abuse of other major drugs.”
Reference: NIDA IndoFacts: Marijuana, National Institute of Drug Abuse.  Science 1997, 276(5321): 2050-2054 “Activation of cortocotropin-releasing factor in the limbic system during cannabinoid withdrawal”. Proc National Academy of Science 1998, 95(17): 10269-10273 “Melolimbic dopaminergic decline after cannabinoid withdrawal”

FACT: CANNABIS IS LINKED TO VIOLENCE

“Cannabis linked to aggression”
Press Association 2006, www.scotsman.com/news

“Marijuana had a greater effect on increasing the degree of violent behaviour in non-delinquent individuals than in delinquent individuals”
Journal of Addictive Disorders 2003, 22: 63-78

FACTS: DAMAGE TO PHYSICAL HEALTH

Birth defects: 

“Risk of Selected Birth Defects with Prenatal Illicit Drug Use”
Reference: Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, part A, 70: 7-18, 2007.

“Some babies born to women who abused marijuana during pregnancy display altered responses to visual stimuli, increased tremulousness, and a high-pitched cry, whic may indicate neurological problems in development”
NIDA InfoFacts: Marijuana. Neurotoxicology and Teratology 1987, 9(1): 1-7 “Neonatal behavioural correlates of prenatal exposure to marijuana, cigarettes and alcohol in a low-risk population”
Child Development 1989, 60(23/24): 764-771 “Effects of marijuana use during pregnancy on newborn crying”

During pre-school years, marijuana-exposed children performed tasks involving sustained attention and memory more poorly than nonexposed children”
NIDA InfoFacts: Marijuana. Life Sciences 1995, 56(23-24):2159-2168 “”The Ottawa prenatal prospective study: methodological issues and findings. It’s easy to throw the baby out with the bath water”
Neurotoxicology and Teratology 2001, 23(1):1-11 “A literature review of the consequences of prenatal marihuana exposure: An emerging theme of a deficiency in aspects of executive function”

“In the school years, these children are more likely to exhibit deficits in problem-solving skills, memory and the ability to remain attentive”
NIDA InfoFacts: Marijuana. Life Sciences 1995, 56(23-24):2159-2168 “”The Ottawa prenatal prospective study: methodological issues and findings. It’s easy to throw the baby out with the bath water”

Pain:

“Too much cannabis worsens pain”
BBC News, 24 October 2007

“Marijuana won’t stop multiple sclerosis pain”
Neurology 2002, 58: 1404-1407

“[Shedding] light on controversial medical marijuana study”
Pushing Back, www.pushingback.com

Respiratory system damage:

“Marijuana smoke contains higher levels of certain toxins than tobacco smoke”
Science Daily, 18 December 2007

“Marijuana smokers face rapid lung destruction – as much as 20 years ahead of tobacco smokers”
Science Daily, 27 January 2008

“One cannabis joint is as bad as five cigarettes”
Reuters UK, 31 July 2007

“Someone who smokes marijuana regularly may have many of the same respiratory problems that tobacco smokers do”
NIDA InfoFacts: marijuana. Western Journal of Medicine 1990, 152(5): 525-530 “Pulmonary complications of smoked substance abuse”

“Use of marijuana impairs lung function”
Addiction 2002, 97: 1055-1061

“Marijuana users usually inhale more deeply and hold their breath longer than tobacco smokers do, which increases the lungs’ exposure to carcinogenic smoke”
NIDA InfoFacts: marijuana.

“Study: Smoking cannabis causes damage to lungs”
Reuters UK

“Respiratory and immunologic consequences of marijuana smoking”
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2002

“Respiratory effects of marijuana and tobacco use in a US sample”
Journal of Gen Intern Medicine 2004, 20:33-37

“A study of 450 individuals found that people who smoke marijuana frequently but do not smoke tobacco have more health problems and miss more days of work than non-smokers. Many of the extra sick days were for respiratory illness.”
Reference: NIDA IndoFacts: Marijuana, National Institute of Drug Abuse. Western Journal of Medicine 1993, 158(6): 596-601 “Health care use by frequent marijuana smokers who do not smoke tobacco” 

Cancer:

“Association between marijuana use and transitional cell carcinoma”
Adult Urology 2006, 100-104

“A study comparing 173 cancer patients and 176 healthy patients produced evidence that marijuana smoking doubled or tripled the risk of head and neck cancers”
NIDA InfoFacts: Marijuana.  Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 1999, 8(12): 1071-1078 “Marijuana use and increased risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck”

“Marijuana use has the potential to promote cancer of the lungs”
NIDA Infofacts: Marijuana. NIDA InfoFacts: marijuana.
Western Journal of Medicine 1990, 152(5): 525-530 “Pulmonary complications of smoked substance abuse”.
Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 1994, 26(3):285-288 “Possible role of marijuana smoking as a carcinogen in the development of lung cancer at a young age”.
Recent Advances in Phytochemistry, 1975 “On the carcinogenicity of marijuana smoke”.

Aids/HIV:

“Marijuana component opens the door for virus that causes Kaposi’s Sarcoma”
Science Daily, 2 August 2007

Strokes:

“More evidence ties marijuana to stroke risk”
Reuters Health, 22 February 2005

“Pot use tied to stroke in three teenagers”
Reuters Health, 26 April 2004

Heart attack:

“An abuser’s risk of heart attack more than quadruples in the first hour after smoking marijuana”
Reference: NIDA IndoFacts: Marijuana, National Institute of Drug Abuse.  Circulation 2001, 103(23): 2805-2809 “Triggering myocardial infarction by marijuana

Immune system damage:

“Immunological changes associated with prolonged marijuana smoking”
American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, 17 November 2004

Infertility:

“Marijuana firmly linked to infertility”
Scientific American, 22 December 2000

Brain damage:

“Marijuana may affect blood flow in brain”
Reuters UK, 7 February 2005

FACTS: DAMAGE TO MENTAL HEALTH

Schizophrenia, depression:

“Cannabis-related schizophrenia set to rise”
Science Daily, 26 March 2007

“Using pot may heighten risk of becoming psychotic”
Associated Press, 26 July 2007

“Anterior cingulated grey-matter deficits and cannabis use in first-episode schizophrenia”
British Journal of Psychiatry 2007, 190: 230-236

“Marijuana increases risk of both psychosis in non-psychotic people as well as poor prognosis for those with risk of vulnerability to psychoses”
American Journal of Epidemiology 2002, 156: 319-327

“Psychophysiological evidence of altered neural synchronisation in cannabis use: relationship to schizotypy”
American Journal of Psychiatry 2006, 163: 1798-1805

“Marijuana linked to schizophrenia, depression”
British Medical Journal, 21 November 2007

“Cannabis shows anti-depression benefits but too much has reverse effect”
Canadian Press, 24 October 2007

“Depression, anxiety and personality disturbances have been associated with chronic marijuana use”
NIDA InfoFacts: Marijuana.
NYS Psychologist, January 2001, 35-39 “The effect of early marijuana use on later anxiety and depressive symptoms”.
Journal of Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 1998, 37(3): 322-330 “Longitudinal study of co-occurring psychiatric disorders and substance use”.

FACTS: ADDICTION TO MARIJUANA AND GATEWAY EFFECT

“Occurrence of cannabis use disorders and other cannabis-related problems among first-year college students”
Addictive Behaviors 33(3): 397-411, March 2008

“Regular or heavy use of cannabis was associated with increased risk of using other illicit drugs”
Addiction 2006, 101: 556-569

“As marijuana use rises, more people are seeking treatment for addiction”
Wall Street Journal, 2 May 2006

“Adolescent cannabis exposure alters opiate intake and opioid limbic neuronal populations in adult rats”
Neuropsychopharmacology 2006, 10-9

“25-year longitudinal study affirms  link between marijuana use and other illicit drug use”
Congress of the United States, 14 March 2006

“New study reveals marijuana is addictive and users who quit experience withdrawal”
All Headline News, 6 February 2007

“Cannabis withdrawal among non-treatment-seeking adult cannabis users”
American Journal on Addiction 2006, 15: 8-14

“Escalation of drug use in early onset cannabis users vs co-twin controls”
Journal of the American Medical Association 2003, 289: 4

FACTS: LEARNING AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR

“Because marijuana compromises the ability to learn and remember information, the more a person uses it the more s/he is likely to fall behind in accumulating intellectual, job or social skills. Moreover, marijuana’s adverse impact on memory and learning can last for days or weeks after the acute effects of the drug wear-off”.
NIDA InfoFacts: Marijuana.
JAMA 1996, 275(7): 521-527 “The residual cognitive effects of heavy marijuana use in college students”.
Psychopharmacology 1993, 100(1-2): 219-228 “Effects of chronic marijuana use on human cognition”.

“Students who smoke marijuana get lower grades and are less likely to graduate from school, compared with their non-smoking peers”
NIDA InfoFacts: Marijuana.  Addiction 2000, 95(11): 1621-1630 “”Effects of adolescent cannabis use on educational attainment: a review”
Archive General Psychiatry 1996, 53(1):71-80 “High school students who use crack and other drugs”
Australia NZ Journal of Psychiatry 1990, 24(1):45-56 “Adolescent marijuana use: risk factors and implications”
Am Journal of Public Health 1999, 89(10):1549-1554 “The risks for late adolescence fo early adolescent marijuana use”.

“The ability of long-term heavy marijuana abusers to recall words from a list remained impaired for a week after quitting but returned to normal in 4 weeks”
NIDA InfoFacts: Marijuana.  Archive General Psychiatry 2001, 58(10):909-915 “Neuropsychological performance in long-term cannabis users”

“Depression, anxiety and personality disturbances have been associated with chronic marijuana use”
NIDA InfoFacts: Marijuana. NYS Psychologist, January 2001, 35-39 “The effect of early marijuana use on later anxiety and depressive symptoms”.
Journal of Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 1998, 37(3): 322-330 “Longitudinal study of co-occurring psychiatric disorders and substance use”.

EMPLOYABILITY:

“A study of 450 individuals found that people who smoke marijuana frequently but do not smoke tobacco have more health problems and miss more days of work than non-smokers. Many of the extra sick days were for respiratory illness.”
Reference: NIDA IndoFacts: Marijuana, National Institute of Drug Abuse. Western Journal of Medicine 1993, 158(6): 596-601 “Health care use by frequent marijuana smokers who do not smoke tobacco” 

“Several studies associate workers’ marijuana smoking with increased absences at work, tardiness, accidents, workers’ compensation claims and job turnover”
NIDA Info Facts: Marijuana.  JAMA 1990, 264(20): 2639-2643 “Efficacy of pre-employment drug screening for marijuana and cocaine in predicting employment outcome”

“Heavy marijuana abusers reported that the drug impaired several important measures of life achievement including cognitive abilities, career status, social life and physical and mental health”
NIDA InfoFacts: Marijuana. Psychological Medicine 2003, 33(8): 1415-1422 “Attributes of long-term heavy cannabis users: a case control study”

QUOTES FROM EXPERTS:

“Five years ago, 95% of psychiatrists would have said that cannabis doesn’t cause psychosis. Now I would estimate that 95% say it does.”
Professor Robin Murray, director – Institute of Psychiatry, London, October 2006

“The mistake was that in its 2002 report, the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs denied that cannabis was a contributory cause of schizophrenia, continued to deny this for the next two years and thus misled ministers into repeatedly stating that there was no causal link between cannabis and psychosis.”
Professor Robin Murray, letter to the Guardian, 19 January 2006

“Use more often than twice a week for even a short time, or use for 5 years or more even once a month, may each lead to a compromised ability to function to their full mental capacity, and could possibly result in lasting impairments.”
Dr Nadia Solowij, “Cannabis and cognitive functioning” 1998

“THC encourages both physical and psychological dependence and is highly abusable. It causes mood changes, loss of memory, psychoses, impairment of coordination and perception, and complicates pregnancy.”
The warning on Nabilone, a THC replacement

“In the 60s and 70s, the average THC content of herbal cannabis was under 1%. Today’s specially bred varieties such as skunk and nederweed have THC contents of anything from 9-27%. These strong types are now commonly grown in the UK and are thought to account for 60% of cannabis consumed here.”
Mary Brett, former head of health education, Dr Challoner’s Grammar School, Amersham, Bucks

THE INDEPENDENT, 16 Sept 2007

“When the Independent on Sunday campaigned for decriminalisation of cannabis, we reflected the common view... that the drug was less dangerous than either tobacco or alcohol. Our editorial line was followed by the Daily Telegraph. Now that confusion has become a real problem... No sooner had cannabis been downgraded in the eyes of the law than most credible authorities began to warn it was considerably more dangerous than originally thought. That evidence led this newspaper, in March to renounce its campaign to decriminalise cannabis.

“For most people, cannabis is not as dangerous as amphetamines or heroin; the trouble is you cannot be sure who is susceptible to the risk of serious psychological harm. For those people, cannabis can be as destructive of personality as any other illegal drugs. [There is] a simple test to identify vulnerability to cannabis-induced psychosis, but ti will not be generally available for several years.

“We report a further complication. One of the arguments for reclassifying cannabis as less serious was that users did not tend to steal to pay for their habit. But disturbing new research suggests otherwise. An academic study in Sheffield suggests one in four young offenders stole to pay for cannabis.

“As we also report, many young people think that cannabis is legal and harmless. They are not aware that under-18s should be arrested for possession of cannabis.

“Public information campaigns have not succeeded so far. The simpler the message, the better; and the simplest is that cannabis is dangerous and illegal.”

Consistent policing is important. It is not clear that most poice forces ahve a zero-tolerance approach to amoking cannabis in public places, which is essential to reinforce the message that the drug is illegal.

Criminalising young people is no answer. The best way to get across information about the health risks of cannabis is to make it a medical or mental-health issue rather than one of criminal justice.

Deirdre Boyd

April 28, 2008

THE RIGHT TIME FOR WOMEN TO QUIT SMOKING

Women smokers seeking to kick the habit have a greater chance of success if they do so in the days before their menstrual cycle, say scientists from the University of Minnesota.

Surges and lulls in levels of the sex hormones oestrogen and progesterone during a typical 28-day cycle could affect the severity of nicotine withdrawal symptoms, they suggest. The hormones might also influence the speed at which nicotine is removed from the blood.

Already there is evidence of links between periods and mood swings, with drug/alcohol-relapse implications for women in early recovery. It might also explain why women tend to light up more at certain points.

The study tested 200 women, half of whom were asked to give up smoking in the 'follicular' stage of their cycle, the time between a period ending and ovulation, when an egg is relased from the ovary. The other half were asked to give up in the 'luteal' stage, the fortnight or so beween ovulation and the start of the next cycle. After 30 days, only 20% of the women who quit in their follicular phase were still smoke-free. In the luteal group, the success rate was 40%.

Deirdre Boyd

April 20, 2008

DIFFERENT STRAINS OF CANNABIS CAUSE DIFFERENTPROBLEMS

People who smoke different strains of cannabis show different psychological symptoms, states a study in the April British Journal of Psychiatry. Research suggests a link between cannabis use and psychosis, such as schizophrenia. But cannabis contains a number of chemicals known as cannabinoids, which might have different effects.

The main component of smoked cannabis is a cannabinol known as THC, which is thought to be responsible for the psychosis-like effects of the drug. THC has been shown to raise anxiety levels and psychotic symptoms in healthy people. In contrast, another cannabinol, known as CBD, has been found to lower anxiety and to have antipsychotic properties. The ratio of these two compounds in smoked cannabis varies – there are higher levels of THC in ‘skunk’ or genetically modified strains of the plant. People who use cannabis regularly have been shown to be more prone to psychosis and delusions. No research had examined the link between these effects and the CBD/THC ratio in cannabis until this study used hair analysis to determine levels of THC and CBD in 140 drug users and relate these to measures of psychosis proneness and delusional thinking.

54 people scored positive for cannabis. Both THC and CBD were found in the hair of 26 of them, and THC alone in the hair of 20 others. Participants completed a questionnaire to assess psychosis proneness - for example, experience of hallucinations and delusions, thought disorder, social withdrawal and impulsiveness.

The researchers found significant differences between the 3 groups (THC only, THC+CBD, and no cannabinoid). The THC only group had significantly higher scores for psychosis proneness than the no cannabinoid group and the THC+CBD group. The THC+CBD group also had significantly lower scores for social withdrawal compared with the no cannabinoid group.

Compared with the no cannabinoid group, there were significantly higher scores for delusional thinking in the THC-only group, and a trend for greater scores in the THC +CBD group.

The researchers comment that this study is the first to show that hair analytic techniques can be used to distinguish different groups of cannabis users. The implication is that people who smoke different strains of cannabis have different psychological symptoms.

These findings suggest that smoking strains of cannabis containing CBD in addition to THC may be protective against the psychotic-like symptoms caused by THC alone. However, another explanation of these results might be that pre-existing differences in psychosis proneness between people who use cannabis could draw them to smoke different strains of the drug.

This research highlights the importance of distinguishing between different cannabinoids, and has implications in the debate over the link between cannabis and psychosis.

Morgan C J A and Curran HV (2008). Effects of cannabidiol on schizophrenia-like symptoms in people who use cannabis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 192, 306-307.

For further information contact Dr Celia Morgan, University College London, or Valerie Curran.

   

Deirdre Boyd

April 18, 2008

MORE THAN TWO DRINKS RISKS ALZHEIMER'S

More than two alcoholic drinks a day could mean you get Alzheimer's disease almost five years earlier than otherwise. If you also smoke, you hasten the onset of of the degenerative brain condition by up to seven years.

The findings come from a study by Mount Sinai Hospital presented at the American Academy of Neurology's annual conference. Its team looked at 938 people aged 60+ who were diagnosed with possible of probable Alzheimer's.

Deirdre Boyd

April 14, 2008

TWO WINES A DAY DOUBLE BREAST-CANCER RISK

A study by researchers at the University of Chicago of almost 185,000 women found that just two large glasses of wine a day can raise the risk of breast cancer by 51%. One large glass of wine raises the risk by about a  third.

The study, one of the largest of its kind, adds to a growing evidence base linking alcohol to a disease which kills over 1,000 UK women each month.

Indeed, experts believe alcohol is the main factor behind surging rates of breast cancer in the UK and is to blame for one in 20 of the 44,000 cases diagnosed annually. It is also blamed for the increasing number of women with liver and fertility problems.

The University of Chicago study showed that the link also applied to beer and spirits, even when other factors such as age, weight and family history of breast cancer were taken into account. Beer raised the threat slightly more than wine, but wine was surprisingly more dangerous than spirits.

Previous research has shown binge drinking dramatically raises the risk of breast cancer, with women who drink the equivalent of two bottles of wine over a weekend mroe than doubling their changes of getting the disease. It is thought that alcohol stops the body from breaking down oestrogen, a hormone which can fuel the growth of breast cancer. Chemicals produced when alcohol is digested might also be linked.

Deirdre Boyd

April 08, 2008

ALCOHOL HOSPITAL ADMISSIONS RISE 50%

Alcohol-related casualty admissions in the South West rose by 50% between 2001-5, according to a survey by the SW Public Health Observatory.

It also raised concerns about the number of young people drinking too much: the report estimated that 728,500 people aged from 16-64 in the region drink to "hazardous" levels and about 119,000 are dependent drinkers.

The number of under 18-year-olds admitted to hospital because of acute intoxication increased by 60% and by 140% in those aged 18-24 years old.

"Not only does it affect the health of the person misusing it at a massive cost to the health service, it also has a wider impact, affecting children, families, education, work productivity, crime and disorder,” said Dr Gabriel Scally, regional director of public health at NHS South West.

"If alcohol-specific mortality rates and hospital admissions were reduced across the region to the rates experienced in the least deprived fifth of areas, 300 premature deaths and about 7,300 hospital admissions a year could be prevented."

Deirdre Boyd

April 05, 2008

TEENAGE DRINKING CORRODES MEMORY

Youngdrinker Binge drinking as a teenager could damage memory for years, says researcher Dr Thomas Heffernan, A Northumbria University psychologist, at the British Psychological Society 's annual conference in Dublin. This is critical, given that children of 12 are being treated for alcoholism.

"Excess alcohol and binge drinking damages parts of the brain which underpin memory," he said. "And as teenagers' brains are still developing, they could be storing up problems."

Heffernan looked at the effect of alcohol on memory in 60 youngsters aged 16-19 years old. Half were "effectively binge alcoholics" while the other half drank rarely or never. They played a computer game which required them to remember and complete tasks as they walked along a fictional high street. Binge drinkers did significantly worse, completing up to a third fewer tasks properly.

Deirdre Boyd

March 21, 2008

ALCOHOL HOSPITAL ADMISSIONS CLIMB 26%

The number of alcohol-related hospital admissions shot up by more than 26% since the introduction of 24-hour pub drinking [17 March 2008]. Over 162,000 people were taken into hospital after turning up at casualty departments with alcohol-related complaints last year, up from 128,000 admissions in 2005, the year before Labour's liberalisation of drinking hours went into effect.

The increase was not referred to in the government's recent review of the effect of the licensing law reforms. Instead, the review for Gordon Brown said that their impact on A&E departments had been "stable" overall. But the new figures - quietly made available to MPs in early March - suggest that demand at casualty departments is far from stable.

Rising health problems should now be added to the rising violence that ministers already admit has followed the new drink laws. The review of the licensing laws found that since the end of 2005 the number of serious violent crimes committed between 3.00am and 6.00am has risen by 25%.

The Department of Culture said that "A wide-ranging programme of work has begun across government to address alcohol-related harm and disorder".

Deirdre Boyd

March 20, 2008

IT PAYS TO REWARD TREATMENT PROVIDERS BY RESULTS

A government which pays substance-abuse treatment providers for results, not services, could foster improved quality of care and accountability, according to the Treatment Research Institute, in a study published in Health Policy. It was co-authored by Thomas McLellan PhD and colleagues from TRE in Philadelphia and by Jack Kemp, TRI consultant and former director of substance abuse services in Delaware.

They studied Delaware's results-oriented contracting system and concluded that providers "improved their ability to attract patients and keep them engaged in treatment longer – both signs of improved addiction treatment quality and accountability for services."

States typically pay providers on a fixed contract basis or based on the number of patients they treat. But Delaware switched to performance-based contracting in 2002, paying providers more or less depending on whether they met certain targets for capacity utilisation and retention of patients in treatment.

Between 2001 and 2006, capacity rose from 54% to 95%, while the average for patients actively participating in treatment for more than 30 days increased from 53% to 70%. The improvements were realised despite the fact that programmes tended to take in patients with more severe addiction problems over the course of the study.

"Substance-abuse treatment providers who stood to gain or lose financially under the contract system might have taken steps to make their services more appealing to patients and do more to integrate evidence-based practices," McLellan and Kemp said.

MAKING DETOX WORK.

Perhaps based on improvements already documented, Delaware later opened a new front on the government pay-for-performance experiment: using financial incentives to increase numbers of detoxification patients subsequently referred to and retained in rehabilitative care. Detoxification services are some of the most expensive state governments pay for, yet studies show marginal impact on long-term recovery when detoxification patients don't continue into rehabilitative care.

"The entire addiction field will be watching if Delaware is able to cut into its 'detox-only' rates through performance contracting," McLellan said.

BACKGROUND.

The unusual pay-for-performance system was undertaken in fiscal year 2002 by the Delaware Division of Substance Abuse and Mental Health when it replaced its cost reimbursement contracts with performance-based contracts with all outpatient addiction treatment programmes. Rather than the government reimbursing providers on a fixed basis (regardless of the number of patients treated), or for the number of addiction treatment services delivered (regardless of the results), the new model included financial rewards and penalties based on success or failure to achieve agreed-upon targets which most experts agree are predictive of accountability and effectiveness in drug and alcohol treatment: 80% and later 90% capacity utilisation, and active patient participation in treatment.

"Capacity utilisation" is the number of treatment slots filled by providers. "Active patient participation" is the length of time a patient stays in treatment, in this case, the percentage who stayed more than 30 days.

The experiment demonstrated marked increases on both indicators. Comparing 2001 -- the year before the performance contracting -- through 2006, average rates of patient capacity utilization increased from 54% to 95%; and the average proportion of patients who were actively engaged in more than 30 days of substance abuse treatment went from 53% to 70%.

IMPROVEMENTS DESPITE PROBLEMATIC PATIENTS.

Importantly, the changes were not due to programmes admitting more selectively. Indeed, there were significant increases in the severity of drug, alcohol and other problems presented by patients across the years of the incentives, the TRI study noted.

Kemp cited several factors which may have contributed to the performance improvement. Programmes integrated evidence-based practices into daily care and made other structural changes to make their facilities and services more appealing. More treatment venues, better proximity to the populations most needing services, more convenient hours of operation, and refurbished facilities were some of them.

Other steps the State took to make the experiment a success included efforts to engage addiction treatment providers as full partners from the outset, allowing them to select practices and procedures they thought would work – rather than forcing a specific set of practices – and re-designing reimbursement and auditing procedures to expedite provider payments, as well as promoting sharing of ideas and "lessons learned" among providers.

Although the TRI study found "clinically and financially significant changes" in the Delaware outpatient addiction treatment system that coincided with pay-for-performance, McLellan and Kemp warned against attributing the dramatic improvement exclusively to contracting changes when it is possible other forces played a role.

"Indications are that, relative to other system-wide efforts to improve treatment accountability, performance- based contracting is less costly and complicated to implement and seemingly compatible with other accountability initiatives," McLellan said. Kemp added that performance contracting "... is the type of intervention a small to mid-sized system can do within the limits imposed by most contemporary budgets."

The Treatment Research Institute is a not-for-profit research and development organisation specialising in science-driven reform of practice and policy in addiction and substance use.

Deirdre Boyd

February 11, 2008

WHY BRAINY PEOPLE ARE MORE AT RISK FROM ALCOHOL

Intelligent people are more likely to develop alcohol-related health problems than their less brainy counterparts, states the Medical Research Council's social and public-health services unit at Glasgow University.

Its researchers speculate, in the American Journal of Public Health, this is because there is a greater chance of them having stressful jobs which drive them to drink.

The Council also found that women working in male-dominated professions are especially susceptible to alcohol problems.

Middle-class women are particularly likely to drink heavily in their 30s, putting them at risk of liver disease and some cancers.

Scientists looked at 8,710 men and women born in in the UK during one week in 1970. They compared their mental ability at the age of 10 with information about their alcohol consumption and drink problems at 30. People with higher childhood mental-ability scores had higher rates of problem drinking in adulthood. The extra risk was higher for intelligent women than men.

The Office for National Statistics shows that the more that you earn, the more you drink - people in higher income groups consume 30% more alcohol than the 'working classes'. Those in the very highest income brackets drink even more.

REVISING CONSUMPTION CALCULATIONS

Because of the trend towards larger wine glasses, the govenment was forced to revise consumption calculations.

Under the old calculation system, a glass of wine was one unit; now it counts as two. The change mean that professionals could be drinking up to 50% more than the old figures indicated. Latest calculations reveal the average woman drinks 9 units a week, men 18.7 units.

Deirdre Boyd

February 08, 2008

ALCOHOL-RELATED DEATHS DOUBLE

Figures from the Office for National Statistics show that alcohol-related death rates for all people are now double the level they were 15 years ago, In 2006, there were 13.4 deaths per 100,000 people. In 1991, there were 6.9 deaths per 100,000

Deirdre Boyd

January 15, 2008

The ACoA FACT FINDER

The UK's largest-ever survey into the extent and traits of children of alcoholics previewed its findings at Addiction Today's conference. It has even more impact than mental illness, concludes Professor Martin Callingham.

This article was first published in Addiction Today November 1999.

23,378 people across the UK were selected at random and interviewed in 1998, in their own homes, to investigate the extent and characteristics of adults who grew up in a home with alcoholic parents. Many of the people recruited from this to take further part in the survey did not have contact with the substance-abuse or mental-health professions - which makes this survey almost unique in terms of the nature and 'representativeness' of those from whom the data was then collected.

                                Responders         Agreed     %

Total                       23,378                   9,789        41.8%

Alcohol                    1,464                      953         65.0

Mental health         1,019                      707        69.3

Trauma                   2,401                   1,548         64.4

No p